Court of Appeals of Kansas· 10/21/2005
State v. Montgomery
Citations
- 34 Kan. App. 2d 549
- 122 P.3d 392
- 2005 Kan. App. LEXIS 1046
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \when a defendant purposefully waives arraignment . . . the waiver is an effective substitute for the arraignment and there is no need for further arraignment proceedings to begin the running of the speedy-trial clock\
- holding that \when a defendant purposefully waives arraignment . . . the waiver is an effective substitute for the arraignment and there is no need for further arraignment proceedings to begin the running of the speedy-trial clock\
- holding that \when a defendant purposefully waives arraignment . . . the waiver is an effective substitute for the arraignment and there is no need for further arraignment proceedings to begin the running of the speedy-trial clock\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Malone, McAnany
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CalvinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 53×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-25· cited 51×
- State v. JakewaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 48×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-05-04· cited 25×
- State v. RosineSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-06-10· cited 20×
- State v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-08-15· cited 14×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-10-26· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.