State v. Montgomery
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 5278
Syllabus
The trial court, at appellant's sentencing hearing, did not mention post-release control, and the sentencing entry does not accurately state the duration of the mandatory post-release control. Therefore, this portion of Appellant's sentence was not properly imposed and is void. Since Appellant has completed his prison term, he cannot be resentenced. The trial court, accordingly, erred by overruling Appellant's motion to vacate post-release control. Judgment reversed, post-release control portion of Appellant's sentence vacated, and remanded for the trial court to notify the parole authority of the vacation of post-release control.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 641×
- State v. HoldcroftOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-20· cited 230×
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 175×
- State v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-20· cited 59×
- State v. AdkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-10· cited 11×
- State v. MaserOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-21· cited 7×
- State v. TanksleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.