State v. Monroe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding an error was harmless where the trial court made an explicit statement that each probation violation was an independently sufficient ground for revocation
• concluding an error was harmless where the trial court made an explicit statement that each probation violation was an independently sufficient ground for revocation
• affirming where trial court “found that any one of the bases would have been sufficient to support the revocation” of the defendant’s probation
• affirming where trial court “found that any one of the bases would have been sufficient to support the revocation” of the defendant’s probation
• affirming where trial court “found that any one of the bases would have been sufficient to support the revocation” of the defendant’s probation
• affirming revocation where a single probation violation was well founded, when the trial court stated that it would have revoked probation based on any one of multiple violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rivera-Waddle
  Lane County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-29· cited 13×
• State v. Cunningham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-10· cited 2×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-08

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kacin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-01· cited 14×
• State v. Winters
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-14· cited 3×