State v. Monk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[t]he fact that the defendant’s counsel did not request a com- petency hearing is an indicator of the defendant’s com- petency’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kendall
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-09-14· cited 32×
• State v. Stith
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-05-27· cited 10×
• Irizarry v. Irizarry
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-07-19· cited 9×
• State v. CARMELO T.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-30· cited 7×
• Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-04-11· cited 6×
• State v. Yeaw
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-01-12
• State v. Alvarado
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-12-11

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• Pate v. Robinson
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
• State v. Golding
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-02· cited 89×
• State v. Torres
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 72×
• State v. Silva
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-28· cited 39×
• State v. Silva
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-10· cited 34×
• State v. Casado
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-07-30· cited 25×
• State v. Boscarino
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-12-14· cited 17×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-19· cited 14×
• State v. Mordasky
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-10· cited 11×
• State v. Benitez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-20· cited 8×