State v. Monfre
Citations
- 122 La. 513
- 47 So. 876
- 1908 La. LEXIS 492
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law (§ 15*) — Statutes—Express Repeal.</p> <p>Where, pending the trial of accused for blowing up, with explosives, a house, etc., Laws 1908, p. 384, Act No. 263, was enacted, section 1 of which made it a capital offense to will-’ fully blow up, etc., any house, etc., wherein persons are customarily found, and section 2 (page 385) repealed all conflicting laws, but provided that no offense theretofore committed against the repealed laws should be condoned thereby or its prosecution affected, the prior acts were not repealed, so as-to affect the prosecution of accused.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, .see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 17-19; Dec. Dig. § 15.*]</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “Doe turned eighteen in 2008”
- “The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense and need not be negatived by the language of the complaint.”
- “The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense and need not be negatived by the language of the complaint.”
- Title IX and § 1983 claims also subject to D.C. tolling rules
- in sex-abuse case, dismissing battery claim under one-year statute of limitations
- denying application of the discovery rule in sexual abuse case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.