State v. Monfort
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3126
Syllabus
Appellant's claim that his guilty pleas were invalid because he did not realize the trial court could impose a sentence that exceeded the maximum recommended prison term for his two drug possession offenses lacks merit. The trial court advised appellant at the plea hearing that, in addition to the maximum prison term, appellant could receive 578 days in prison as a sanction for committing his offenses while on post-release control. In addition, appellant's claim that the 578-day sanction imposed at sentencing is contrary to law lacks merit, as it complies with R.C. 2929.141(A)(1). Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-20· cited 69×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 26×
- State v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-12· cited 8×
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-28· cited 6×
- State v. MelsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-14· cited 5×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-26· cited 2×
- State v. CheekOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.