State v. Moncrief
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1770
Syllabus
Principles of felony sentencing; R.C. 2929.11; sentencing factors; R.C. 2929.12; juvenile mitigating factors; R.C. 2929.19(B)(1)(b); appellate review of felony sentencing; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). Court did not err sentencing juvenile defendant to a five-year term of imprisonment for first-degree felony. The court imposed a sentence within the statutory range applicable to the offense to which appellant pled guilty. Record did not clearly and convincingly demonstrate that court failed to consider principles of felony sentencing and the sentencing factors, including juvenile mitigating factors. During the sentencing hearing, defense counsel asked the court to consider appellant's age, past trauma, and home environment as mitigating factors. In response, court stated on the record that it did not believe this information overcame the presumption of prison. Sentencing journal entry stated that court considered all factors required by law and found that prison was consistent with the purpose of R.C. 2929.11.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HintonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-25· cited 115×
- State v. CollierOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-09· cited 87×
- State v. PawlakOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
- State v. ArtisOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-27· cited 11×
- State v. SpencerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-21· cited 7×
- State v. BillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-16· cited 3×
- State v. Carter-ElOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.