Skip to main content

State v. Moncrief

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1770

Syllabus

Principles of felony sentencing; R.C. 2929.11; sentencing factors; R.C. 2929.12; juvenile mitigating factors; R.C. 2929.19(B)(1)(b); appellate review of felony sentencing; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). Court did not err sentencing juvenile defendant to a five-year term of imprisonment for first-degree felony. The court imposed a sentence within the statutory range applicable to the offense to which appellant pled guilty. Record did not clearly and convincingly demonstrate that court failed to consider principles of felony sentencing and the sentencing factors, including juvenile mitigating factors. During the sentencing hearing, defense counsel asked the court to consider appellant's age, past trauma, and home environment as mitigating factors. In response, court stated on the record that it did not believe this information overcame the presumption of prison. Sentencing journal entry stated that court considered all factors required by law and found that prison was consistent with the purpose of R.C. 2929.11.

Judges: Forbes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.