Skip to main content
· 4/15/2002

State v. Momoki

Citations

  • 46 P.3d 1
  • 98 Haw. 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the intent to drive under the influence of drugs, “no matter how egregious the case,” does not equate to or “subsume[ J” the intent to drive without due care
  • upholding the trial court’s denial of Duree’s motion to vacate the sanctions award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Watanabe, Lim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.