Court of Appeals of Utah· 7/6/2012
State v. Mohamed
Citations
- 2012 UT App 183
- 282 P.3d 1066
- 712 Utah Adv. Rep. 31
- 2012 WL 2617579
- 2012 Utah App. LEXIS 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding an insufficiency argument was unpreserved because the basis for the motion for a directed verdict at trial differed from what was argued on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Voros, Orme, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.