Skip to main content

State v. Mohamed

Citations

  • 2012 UT App 183
  • 282 P.3d 1066
  • 712 Utah Adv. Rep. 31
  • 2012 WL 2617579
  • 2012 Utah App. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding an insufficiency argument was unpreserved because the basis for the motion for a directed verdict at trial differed from what was argued on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Voros, Orme, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.