Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/7/2021
State v. Mock
Citations
- 310 Or. App. 454
- 485 P.3d 295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the state may rebut the presumption that evidence must be suppressed “by proving that the unlawful conduct was independent of, or only ten- uously related to the disputed evidence” (internal citation and quotes omitted)
- “Determining a person’s identity * * * [is] reasonably related to the purpose of a traffic stop, so long as those activities are not unreason- ably lengthy.”
- rejecting the state’s attenuation argument because the purpose or lawfulness of the officer’s questioning was not fully explored below but the topic was “highly relevant to whether the travel question was reasonably related to the traffic investigation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shorr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
- State v. Maciel-FigueroaOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 137×
- State v. Arreola-BotelloOregon Supreme Court· 2019-11-15· cited 82×
- State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court· 2013-07-05· cited 71×
- State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 24×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 24×
- State v. BarberMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-22· cited 21×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-02· cited 18×
- State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-14· cited 17×
- State v. BenningCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-19· cited 14×
- State v. LoudCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-16· cited 10×
- State v. DampierCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-07-27· cited 10×
- State v. BroughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-13· cited 10×
- State v. OllerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 9×
- State v. TannehillOregon Supreme Court· 2006-08-03· cited 8×
- State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-31· cited 8×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-16· cited 8×
- State v. MullensCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-27· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.