Skip to main content

State v. Mock

Citations

  • 310 Or. App. 454
  • 485 P.3d 295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the state may rebut the presumption that evidence must be suppressed “by proving that the unlawful conduct was independent of, or only ten- uously related to the disputed evidence” (internal citation and quotes omitted)
  • “Determining a person’s identity * * * [is] reasonably related to the purpose of a traffic stop, so long as those activities are not unreason- ably lengthy.”
  • rejecting the state’s attenuation argument because the purpose or lawfulness of the officer’s questioning was not fully explored below but the topic was “highly relevant to whether the travel question was reasonably related to the traffic investigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.