Skip to main content
· 3/13/2018

State v. M.K.

Citations

  • 913 N.W.2d 187
  • 2018 WI 32
  • 380 Wis. 2d 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the party alleging the injury must be either a consumer of the alleged violator’s goods or services or a competitor of the alleged violator in the restrained market”
  • listing elements of “antitrust injury,” the most important factor in determining “antitrust standing”
  • antitrust injury flowed from discontinuation of a competing product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.