Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 6/18/1986

State v. Miyahira

Citations

  • 721 P.2d 718
  • 6 Haw. App. 320
  • 1986 Haw. App. LEXIS 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the purpose of polling is “to assure the court and the parties that a unanimous verdict has been reached and to give each juror an opportunity to indicate assent to the verdict in open court”
  • stating that the purpose of polling is \to assure the court and the parties that a unanimous verdict has been reached and to give each juror an opportunity to indicate assent to the verdict in open court\
  • single unauthorized communication to the jury after the deliberations and the trial had ended was harmless
  • unauthorized and improper contact with non-jurors taints impartial jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Miyahira

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.