State v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress under the Fourth Amendment attenuation test set forth in Bailey, and recognizing that the result under Article I, section 9, “would almost certainly” be the same
• describing the “unresolved conflict” in this court’s cases regarding the relative priority to be given the “first things first” doctrine and preservation principles
• applying Brown factors, as discussed in Bailey

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Link
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-03-04· cited 28×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 11×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Kennedy
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 519×
• State v. Barber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 38×
• State v. Dempster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-12-06· cited 34×
• State v. Bailey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-11-06· cited 23×
• State v. Velykoretskykh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-28· cited 16×
• State v. Benning
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-19· cited 14×
• State v. Clemons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-24· cited 10×