Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/7/1983
State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 458 A.2d 1089
- 142 Vt. 517
- 1983 Vt. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying de facto doctrine to a deputy sheriff whose certificate of training read “attendance” instead of the statutorily required “completion”
- applying de facto doctrine to a deputy sheriff whose certificate of training read “attendance” instead of the statutorily required “completion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck, Daley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RamsdellSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1971-12-17· cited 31×
- State v. PetersSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-06-08· cited 26×
- In re G. V.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1978-10-30· cited 23×
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1952-06-18· cited 13×
- State v. DarlingSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-06-10· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.