Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/9/1983
State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 675 P.2d 738
- 138 Ariz. 478
- 1983 Ariz. App. LEXIS 656
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he crime of burglary necessarily involves an infringement of the victim‟s right to privacy . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Hathaway, Birdsall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Victoria K.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-07· cited 20×
- State v. KinkadeArizona Supreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 15×
- State v. KozanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-06-17· cited 11×
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-08-21· cited 4×
- State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Lee HindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-06-04
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
- State v. CelayaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-17· cited 138×
- State v. MalloyArizona Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 68×
- Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-01· cited 38×
- State v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-23· cited 32×
- McIntyre v. Mohave CountyArizona Supreme Court· 1980-10-07· cited 30×
- Jim Click Ford, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-07-22· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.