District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/18/1979
State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 377 So. 2d 1006
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- uncontradicted testimony indicates defendant was twice informed of right to refuse consent to search
- drug courier profile and other facts known by officer justified investigatory stop
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haverfield, C.J., and Hendry and Schwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Royer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-09-09· cited 43×
- State v. ButlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-01· cited 10×
- State v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-03· cited 9×
- Sands v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-01· cited 9×
- State v. BankstonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-07· cited 8×
- Harpold v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-07· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- United States v. Robert Ross McCaleb and Brenda PageSixth Circuit· 1977-04-11· cited 152×
- United States v. Charles Steven Ballard, A/K/A James BishopFifth Circuit· 1978-05-26· cited 87×
- State v. FrostDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-08-14· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.