State v. Mississippi Ouachita & Red River R. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prisoner’s “claims for ‘personal injuries,’ including ‘loss of liberty,’ physical and mental pain, emotional distress, anxiety, humiliation, and loss of employment, and wages” all sound in tort and are excluded from the court’s jurisdiction under the Tucker Act
• “[T]he Tucker Act expressly excludes tort claims, including those committed by federal officials, from the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims.”
• \[T]he Tucker Act expressly excludes tort claims ... from the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims.\
• “[T]he Tucker Act expressly excludes tort claims, including those committed by federal officials, from the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims.”
• \[T]he Tucker Act expressly excludes tort claims ... from the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims.\
• \[T]he Tucker Act expressly excludes tort claims ... from the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).