· 3/28/1904
State v. Mioton
Citations
- 112 La. 180
- 36 So. 314
- 1904 La. LEXIS 377
Syllabus
<p>CRIMINAL LAW — PREMATURE APPEAL.</p> <p>1. No final decree has been entered. The appeal is premature. The questions involved cannot be reviewed on appeal at this period in the history of the litigation.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding serious question going to the merits where the complaint and exhibits alleged Defendants provided unnecessary medical services
- “Courts have readily held that irreparable harm occurs where, as here, an insurer is required to waste time defending numerous no-fault actions when those same proceedings could be resolved globally in a single, pending declaratory judgment action.”
- “Facially legitimate treatments may be provided with little variance across multiple patients, but it is only by analyzing the claims as a whole that the irresistible inference arises that the treatments are not being provided on the basis of medical necessity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.