State v. Mintner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where circumstances indicated that defendant was breaking into building, fact that he was discovered within arm’s reach of bolt cutter was sufficient to prove possession of burglar’s tools, even though defendant was not charged with burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lake
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-12-26· cited 6×
• State v. Mills
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-15

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Buffington
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-09-19· cited 32×
• Slade v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1971-03-03· cited 15×
• State v. Saffold
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-08-31· cited 7×
• State v. Hansen
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1977-01-03· cited 3×
• State v. Emery
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-12-30· cited 3×
• State v. Farmer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-02-11· cited 3×
• People v. Vasquez
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1976-01-28· cited 2×