State v. Milton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant “was entitled to appointed counsel at the restitution hearing” based on state criminal-procedure rule and jurisprudence that “the setting of restitution is an integral part of sentencing” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hassan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-10-21· cited 18×
• State v. Maddox
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-01-28· cited 7×
• State v. Milton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-03-15· cited 1×
• State Of Washington, V Ibrahim H. Hassan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-10-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• State v. Speaks
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 83×
• State v. Kisor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-02-04· cited 53×
• State v. Chhom
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 49×