Skip to main content
· 8/6/1954

State v. Miller Home Development, Inc.

Citations

  • 243 Minn. 1
  • 50 A.L.R. 2d 1377
  • 65 N.W.2d 900
  • 1954 Minn. LEXIS 676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “costs and disbursements” are a “procedural element” separate from the concept of “just compensation” under the Minnesota Constitution
  • holding that “costs and disbursements” are a “procedural element” separate from the concept of “just compensation” under the Minnesota Constitution
  • explaining it is \well established” that \a deliberate cutoff of access by all feasible routes is a taking”
  • noting statutory authorization of costs and disbursements required in eminent domain proceedings
  • when state brought proceeding to condemn land and right of access appurtenant to land, but abandoned that part of proceeding involving right of access, landowners entitled to costs incurred in defending that taking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matson, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.