Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/8/2022

State v. Miller

Citations

2022 Ohio 4385

Syllabus

Felony contrary to law purposes and principles recidivism mitigation consideration factors sentencing Reagan Tokes constitutional due process separation of powers trial by jury. The imposed sentence was not contrary to law. The indefinite sentencing scheme enacted under the Reagan Tokes Law is not unconstitutional. The trial court complied with the requirements of the Reagan Tokes Law when imposing an indefinite sentence of the defendant's second-degree felony conviction.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Foster
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. Delvallie
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-17· cited 274×
State v. Keith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-04· cited 77×
State v. Pawlak
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-03-15· cited 57×
State v. Wilburn
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-04· cited 43×
State v. Simmons
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-25· cited 41×
State v. Price
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-16· cited 38×
State v. Ongert
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-14· cited 37×
State v. Gamble
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-27· cited 32×
State v. Bridges
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-09· cited 11×
State v. Angel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-13· cited 11×
State v. Taylor
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-22· cited 7×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.