State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying abuse of discretion standard and ruling that a new trial is required only when the court is satisfied that the recantation is true
• applying abuse of discretion standard and ruling that a new trial is required only when the court is satisfied that the recantation is true
• reaffirming adoption of the “prevailing judicial attitude that recanting testimony is to be viewed with great suspicion,” and determining that a court hearing a request to withdraw an Alford plea should grant the request “only when the court is satisfied that the recantation is true”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Schneider
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2000-01-18· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• State v. Perry
  Montana Supreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 77×
• United States v. John Chizoba Adi
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-04-19· cited 45×
• State v. Miller
  Montana Supreme Court· 1991-04-29· cited 22×
• State v. Long
  Montana Supreme Court· 1987-06-11· cited 13×