State v. Miller
Citations
- 90 Kan. 230
- 133 P. 878
- 1913 Kan. LEXIS 196
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Abortion — Information—Charge Sufficient under Statute. The legislature, by section 2532 of General Statutes of 1909, made the willful administration to any pregnant woman of any medicine, drug or substance whatsoever, or the employment or use of any instrument or means whatsoever, with intent thereby to procure an abortion or the miscarriage of such woman, with, no medical advice or necessity therefor, a misdemeanor, regardless of the character of the things administered or' used.</p> <p>2. - The Term “Means Whatsoever” Construed — Ejusdem Generis. The term “any instrument or means whatsoever” is not limited by the rule of ejusdem generis, rules of construction applying only in case ambiguity or uncertainty calls for aids to a correct construction of a statute.</p> <p>3. - Bill of Particulars in Criminal Case — Judicial Discretion. The matter of requiring a bill of particulars in a criminal case is discretionary and when no abuse of discretion is shown no error is committed in refusing such bill.</p> <p>4. Instructions — To Entire Panel at Opening of Term. The statute prescribes the time and manner of instructing juries, and if at the opening of a term it is thought best to address the panel generally touching their duties, care should be used to avoid suggestions or statements likely to influence their decision when called upon later to sit in a given case.</p> <p>5. Abortion — Statement of Prosecutrix as to Parentage of Child —Competent Evidence. The theory of the state was that the father brqught his daughter to the defendant to be relieved of a trouble which he had caused, and that she was received by the accused for the accomplishment of such purpose. Having formerly stated that a brother was the cause of her condition, the daughter testified that she thought he was, and was then asked if any other person had had intercourse with her along about that time, to which she answered, “Yes, — father.” Held, competent as tending to
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refused to apply rule, saying “any instrument or means whatsoev er” is all inclusive and not ambiguous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationSupreme Court· 2022-06-24· cited 482×
- State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-06-15· cited 104×
- State v. AikinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 102×
- State of Kansas v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-04-10· cited 46×
- Trego WaKeeney State Bank v. MaierSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-03-02· cited 34×
- State v. ReuterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-07-07· cited 22×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas· 1940-01-27· cited 21×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-04-07· cited 17×
- Hartman v. Merged Area VI Community CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-10-18· cited 16×
- State v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1929-07-06· cited 14×
- State v. ZakouraSupreme Court of Kansas· 1937-05-08· cited 13×
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1947-11-08· cited 13×
- State v. MillhaubtSupreme Court of Kansas· 1936-11-07· cited 12×
- State v. GilleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1980-08-22· cited 11×
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1937-06-12· cited 11×
- Rose v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-07-07· cited 9×
- Mele v. BeckerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1965-05-17· cited 3×
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1922-02-11· cited 3×
- Klettke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1950-10-25· cited 2×
- State v. IceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-12-08· cited 2×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-01-27· cited 414×
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-02-15· cited 337×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 81×
- State v. GerekeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-11-10· cited 21×
- State v. PratherSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-02-06· cited 20×
- State v. LindgroveCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1895-09-18· cited 17×
- State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals· 1912-02-19· cited 10×
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1900-07-07· cited 10×
- State v. HinkleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1910-01-08· cited 10×
- State v. LackeySupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-10-07· cited 9×
- State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-11-09· cited 9×
- State v. LinkSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-07-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.