Skip to main content

State v. Miller

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3077

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court engaged in the appropriate consecutive sentencing analysis and made the requisite findings in support of consecutive sentences, both at the sentencing hearing and in its judgment entry. Further, the trial court's findings made in support of the consecutive sentences were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.