State v. Miller
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3077
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court engaged in the appropriate consecutive sentencing analysis and made the requisite findings in support of consecutive sentences, both at the sentencing hearing and in its judgment entry. Further, the trial court's findings made in support of the consecutive sentences were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Gwynne (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-11-21· cited 160×
- State v. RodefferOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-27· cited 137×
- State v. Grate (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-10· cited 117×
- State v. WithrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 72×
- State v. DerrickOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.