New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 4/3/1997
State v. Miller
Citations
- 299 N.J. Super. 387
- 691 A.2d 377
- 1997 N.J. Super. LEXIS 154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The purpose of the IAD's requirement that continuances be set in the defendant's presence is to ensure there is a record for appellate review\
- \The purpose of the IAD's requirement that continuances be set in the defendant's presence is to ensure there is a record for appellate review \
- “[I]t has been properly held that since the purpose of the IAD is remedial, it should be accorded liberal construction in favor of prisoners within its purview. The purpose of the statute is to benefit prisoners----” (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Braithwaite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CookNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-02-25· cited 41×
- State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2008-12-12· cited 25×
- State v. PeroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-06-18· cited 12×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-07-31· cited 12×
- Conn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-07-28· cited 7×
- State v. PerryNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-05-10· cited 5×
- State v. PopovichNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-02-17· cited 3×
- State of Tennessee v. Todd Joseph Sweet a/k/a Jamie Lee TurpinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-12-22
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-14· cited 1,823×
- State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-02-07· cited 1,201×
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 731×
- United States v. Thomas NesbittSeventh Circuit· 1988-09-09· cited 149×
- United States v. Richard T. FordSecond Circuit· 1977-02-03· cited 132×
- State v. GhertlerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-03-28· cited 124×
- State v. GalleganSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-12-20· cited 52×
- State v. DiModicaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1963-07-01· cited 41×
- State v. LippolisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1969-10-09· cited 38×
- State v. MasonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1966-03-18· cited 36×
- State v. LippolisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-03-02· cited 27×
- State v. McGannSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-03-28· cited 19×
- Bernard Stroble v. Charles E. Egeler, Warden, State Prison of Southern MichiganSixth Circuit· 1977-01-13· cited 18×
- Stroble v. EgelerE.D. Michigan· 1976-02-23· cited 15×
- State v. BinnNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-03-06· cited 15×
- State v. BinnNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-04-09· cited 12×
- Anderson v. StrobleSupreme Court· 1979-02-26· cited 9×
- State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-12-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.