State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• majority consent required to approve conflict of interest “[u]nless otherwise provided in the articles of organization or any operating agreement”
• “It is elementary * * * that an agent cannot bind his principal, even in matters touching his agency, where he is known to be acting for himself, or to have an adverse interest.” (Internal quotation marks and citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gumm v. Heider
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-01-13· cited 25×
• Bailey v. Frazier
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1912-06-04· cited 16×
• Johnson v. Sheridan Lumber Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1908-02-04· cited 12×
• Synectic Ventures I, LLC v. EVI Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-12-20· cited 11×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1911-01-12· cited 8×
• State v. Clermont
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-03-30· cited 1×
• State v. Bostwick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-25· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. Butchers & Drovers' Bank
  New York Court of Appeals· 1857-09-15· cited 122×
• German Savings Bank of Des Moines v. Des Moines National Bank of Des Moines
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1904-02-12· cited 33×
• Hier v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1904-01-09· cited 31×
• Campbell v. Manufacturers National Bank
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1902-03-03· cited 16×
• Rankin v. Bush
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1904-04-15· cited 7×
• People v. Bough
  New York Supreme Court· 1888-05-18· cited 2×
• State v. Bloodsworth
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1893-12-11· cited 2×