Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/31/2022
State v. Miller
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1798
Syllabus
Defendant appeals judicial sanction for postrelease control violation. Defendant argued court abused discretion and sentence was cruel and unusual. Sanction of prison time, the remaining time to serve on postrelease control, was authorized by statute. Sentence authorized by statute is not cruel and unusual under proportionality review.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court· 2008-05-21· cited 182×
- State v. AccorintiOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-07· cited 20×
- State v. RowlandOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-18· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.