State v. Miller
Citations
- 814 S.E.2d 93
- 371 N.C. 273
Syllabus
Appeal from conviction for first-degree murder (non-capital) whether the trial court violated defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause by allowing a police officer to testify about the deceased victim's statements to him regarding a previous incident of domestic violence involving the victim and defendant.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the issue, but, as stated in footnote 5, declining to decide the issue
- recognizing the issue, but, as stated in footnote 5, declining to decide the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 725×
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2008-06-25· cited 725×
- In re DavisSupreme Court· 1982-12-06· cited 125×
- Otey v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1982-12-06· cited 124×
- United States v. Antwan JacksonFourth Circuit· 2013-01-18· cited 43×
- Wenying Zhou v. Sun Microsystems, IncSupreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 30×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2007-08-24· cited 26×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-06-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.