State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[officer’s] observation of the vehicle in a high- crime area is not sufficient, either by itself or in conjunction with the other ‘factors’ identified by the State, to establish reasonable suspicion of criminal activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-06-08· cited 17×
• State of Iowa v. Johnny Lee McFadden, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2017-09-27
• State v. Carpenter
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-05-02
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-09-04

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Florida v. Royer
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
• United States v. Cortez
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
• Delaware v. Prouse
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
• Florida v. Bostick
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
• Pennsylvania v. Mimms
  Supreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
• United States v. Sharpe
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
• Brown v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
• Rodriguez v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2015-04-21· cited 2,086×
• Illinois v. Caballes
  Supreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
• Maryland v. Wilson
  Supreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
• United States v. Milton L. McCaskill
  Fourth Circuit· 1982-05-28· cited 433×
• State v. Bullock
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-05-10· cited 11×
• State v. Bean
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2013-08-27· cited 2×