State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that OAR 213-005-0008(3) “guide[s] the exercise of judicial discretion in sentencing a defendant for a probation violation for absconding[.]”
• noting that “unless [a] defendant’s probation was extended either by the court or by operation of law beyond [its original term], the court commit[s] error by initiating revocation proceedings *** and revoking probation at a later time”
• OAR 213-005-0008(3) “guide[s] the exercise of judicial discretion in sentenc- ing a defendant for a probation violation for absconding[.]”
• court lacks authority to revoke probation if probation-violation proceeding is not initiated before expiration of probationary term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Berglund
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-12· cited 11×
• State v. Vanlieu
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-25· cited 7×
• State v. Maack
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-15· cited 6×
• State v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-21· cited 6×
• State v. Granberry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 4×
• State v. LaCoe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-12-07· cited 3×
• State v. Herrera
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-08· cited 2×