State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the delay was not “weighed heavily against the” State where the defendant’s own “antics” caused delays in prosecution
• “The constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy affords a criminal defendant three separate protections by prohibiting: (1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal; (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cornejo
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2006-05-25· cited 10×
• Duran v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1990-02-23· cited 6×
• In re J.E.G.
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2020-06-11· cited 5×
• State v. Hintze
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2022-10-14· cited 4×
• State v. Camara
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2023-09-21· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• State v. Banner
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-04-14· cited 64×
• State v. Ossana
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-06-17· cited 31×
• State v. Dyer
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-09-19· cited 24×
• State v. Knill
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-12-22· cited 22×
• State v. Velasquez
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-01-08· cited 19×
• State v. Richards
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-06-30· cited 11×
• State v. Menzies
  Utah Supreme Court· 1979-10-09· cited 6×