Skip to main content

State v. Miller

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2684

Syllabus

R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); consecutive sentence; protect the public from future crime; course of conduct; purposes of felony sentencing. The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences was not contrary to law where the court made the necessary R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings, the court's corresponding judgment entry reflected those statements, and this court did not find clearly and convincingly that the record did not support the trial court's findings. Additionally, the trial court's imposition of the maximum sentence was consistent with the purposes of felony sentencing.

Judges: Klatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.