State v. Miller
Citations
- 2024 ND 167
Syllabus
Restitution must be limited to reasonable damages \directly related\ to a criminal offense or expenses sustained as a \direct result\ of the defendant's criminal action. There must be an immediate and intimate causal connection between the criminal conduct and the damages or expenses for which restitution is ordered. Extradition costs indirectly related to criminal conduct may not be imposed as restitution. A district court is generally bound by the terms of a plea agreement it has accepted. After accepting a plea agreement and entering judgment, the court may not add an additional punishment.
Judges: Crothers, Daniel John
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PippinNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 25×
- State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-11-06· cited 24×
- State v. CarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-07-31· cited 18×
- State v. MarinucciNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-07-01· cited 12×
- State v. BruceNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-02-22· cited 11×
- State v. HarstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-06-29· cited 6×
- State v. McCrearyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-12-01· cited 6×
- State v. GonzalesNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-10-26· cited 3×
- State v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-02-22· cited 3×
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-08-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.