Skip to main content

State v. Middleton

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3498

Syllabus

Sufficient and manifest weight of the evidence was presented to establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that appellant committed the offenses with which he was charged and further that appellant is a mentally ill person subject to court order pursuant to R.C. 2945.39(A)(2) and R.C. 5122.01(B). Therefore, the trial court did not err in retaining jurisdiction over appellant. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.