State v. Middleton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the coercion required by the phrase “uses force or coercion to accomplish the sexual contact” under Minnesota Statutes section 609.345(c) (1984
• \The criminal sexual conduct statutes do not protect only the victim who submits to a sexual assault. The victim who resists is also protected.\
• “The criminal sexual conduct statutes do not protect only the victim who submits to a sexual assault. The victim who resists is also protected.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Meech
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-02-03· cited 6×
• State v. Whitley
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-07-20· cited 6×
• Inga v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2019-03-01· cited 6×
• State v. Whitley
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-08-06· cited 4×
• State v. Kasper
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-26· cited 2×
• State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Clifford Robert Letourneau, III, Appellant
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-07-09

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In Re the Welfare of D.L.K.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-02-14· cited 8×