North Dakota Supreme Court· 5/7/2020
State v. Michel
Citations
- 942 N.W.2d 472
- 2020 ND 101
Syllabus
A district court's response to a jury request for supplemental instructions is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. The identity of the victim is not an element of theft and may be disregarded as surplusage. A victim is entitled to be made whole through a reasonable restitution based on the entirety of his actual losses.
Judges: Tufte, Jerod E.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-01-28· cited 949×
- State v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-02-25· cited 26×
- State v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-01-22· cited 25×
- State v. MatuskaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-12-18· cited 18×
- State v. BrandnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 16×
- State v. StromNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-15· cited 11×
- State v. MohammedNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-02-27· cited 8×
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-07-11· cited 8×
- Haas v. Hudson & Wylie LLPNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-03-19· cited 7×
- State v. WoehlhoffNorth Dakota Court of Appeals· 1994-04-12· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.