Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 11/14/1986

State v. Michael

Citations

  • 729 P.2d 405
  • 111 Idaho 930
  • 1986 Ida. LEXIS 536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the specific mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another; expressio unius est exclusio alterius\
  • “When a statute enumerates the areas which are to be encompassed in its enforcement, it is generally accepted that those areas not specifically mentioned are not to be included.”
  • “When a statute enumerates the areas which are to be encompassed in its enforcement, it is generally accepted that those areas not specifically mentioned are not to be included.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huntley, Donaldson, Shepard, Bakes, Bistline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.