State v. Meyers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• purpose of disclosing witnesses, which is to assist State in trial preparation, undermined when disclosure occurs hours before trial
• “we will accept at face value the court’s reasons for imposing the sentence”
• trial court has discretion to exclude testimony for violation of V.R.Cr.P. 16.1(c)
• decided under similar criminal rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Percy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-08· cited 41×
• State v. Congress
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-12-05· cited 23×
• State v. Verrinder
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-27· cited 15×
• Hutchins v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-04-11· cited 14×
• State v. Passino
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-03-18· cited 13×
• State v. Seagroves
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-11-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Maguire
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-06-07· cited 31×
• State v. Rice
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-08-17· cited 29×
• State v. Dunbar
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-25· cited 24×
• State v. Paquette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-16· cited 19×
• State v. Blaine
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-07-17· cited 5×
• State v. Helton
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-03-31· cited 3×
• State v. Nichols
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-11-23· cited 2×