Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/3/2021
State v. Metz
Citations
- 176 N.E.3d 1196
- 2021 Ohio 3060
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed where the trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress, as Ziploc bag was in plain view and immediately apparent as contraband, and field test of apparent contraband did not require warrant.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 1,624×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 1,010×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 948×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-08· cited 204×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 1998-02-04· cited 180×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1978-07-12· cited 124×
- State v. Hairston (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-05-02· cited 69×
- State v. BuzzardOhio Supreme Court· 2007-02-14· cited 50×
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-18· cited 11×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.