State v. Metcalfe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a motion for judgment of acquittal must be made before a verdict is rendered
• rejecting defendant’s argument that he should be allowed “to move for a judgment of acquittal after a jury verdict if, in hindsight, the evidence did not support the verdict”
• post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal not authorized by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rodriguez v. the Holland, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-04-29· cited 23×
• State v. Vogh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-20· cited 20×
• State v. Moreno
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-27· cited 5×
• State v. Angelo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-23· cited 5×
• State v. Peekema
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-03-25· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• Smalis v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 328×
• State v. Chakerian
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-06-12· cited 50×
• State v. McKenzie
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 27×
• Fox v. Country Mutual Insurance
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-09-11· cited 22×
• State Ex Rel. Penn v. Norblad
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 15×
• State Ex Rel. Haas v. Schwabe
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-12-02· cited 14×
• State Ex Rel. Redden v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-01-08· cited 5×