State v. Mertz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the trial court had “broad probationary powers” allowing it to stay execution of sentence
• considering the merits even though the defendant's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction was procedurally barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carlton v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-18· cited 60×
• State Ex Rel. Branchaud v. Hedman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-09-25· cited 20×
• State Ex Rel. Lillemoe v. Tahash
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-04-26· cited 11×
• State v. Hanf
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-10-19· cited 5×
• Muecke v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-06-05· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fay v. Noia
  Supreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
• Sanders v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 2,713×
• State v. Pruitt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-12-07· cited 7×
• State Ex Rel. Bennett v. Rigg
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-03-04· cited 6×
• United States v. Weiss
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1939-06-01· cited 5×
• United States v. Edelson
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1950-04-20· cited 2×