· 8/24/1984
State v. Merolla
Citations
- 686 P.2d 244
- 100 Nev. 461
- 1984 Nev. LEXIS 419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that criminal statutes of limitation should be construed in favor of the accused
- holding that criminal statutes of limitation should be construed in favor of the accused
- absent clear legislative intent to the contrary, amendment extending statute of limitations operates prospectively only
- “[A]n amendment to a criminal statute of limitations, silent on the question of its retroactive application, must be construed as prospective only and cannot apply to an offense committed before its effective date.”
- statute of limitations in a criminal prosecution is a substantive right
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.