Skip to main content
· 8/24/1984

State v. Merolla

Citations

  • 686 P.2d 244
  • 100 Nev. 461
  • 1984 Nev. LEXIS 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that criminal statutes of limitation should be construed in favor of the accused
  • holding that criminal statutes of limitation should be construed in favor of the accused
  • absent clear legislative intent to the contrary, amendment extending statute of limitations operates prospectively only
  • “[A]n amendment to a criminal statute of limitations, silent on the question of its retroactive application, must be construed as prospective only and cannot apply to an offense committed before its effective date.”
  • statute of limitations in a criminal prosecution is a substantive right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.