Skip to main content
· 12/7/1999

State v. Mensing

Citations

  • 1999 MT 303
  • 991 P.2d 950
  • 297 Mont. 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting prosecutor’s alleged coaching of a sexual assault victim could constitute an assertion of improper influence if the victim was asked about the substance of her conversations with the prosecutor or whether she had discussed the content of her trial testimony with anyone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karla M. Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.