State v. Mendez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the in-court identification was made independent of the improper photographic lineup

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Guerra
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-04· cited 10×
• State v. Houston
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-07· cited 6×
• State v. Skolar
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-02· cited 5×
• State v. Gomez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-27· cited 4×
• State v. Mitchell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-16· cited 3×
• State v. Green
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wilcox
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-02· cited 20×
• State v. Sepulvado
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-08-02· cited 19×
• Cribbs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-02-08· cited 9×