Skip to main content

State v. Mendenhall

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2683

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c). The trial court did not err when it sentenced the appellant to consecutive sentences because the trial court fully complied with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court failed to comply with the advisements under R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) and must provide appellant with the notifications required by law.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.