Montana Supreme Court· 4/17/2012

State v. Melton

Citations

2012 MT 84
276 P.3d 900
364 Mont. 482
2012 WL 1319490
2012 Mont. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“As a general rule, we will affirm a restriction or condition imposed pursuant to [ ] statutory authority so long as the restriction or condition has some correlation or connection i.e., nexus to the underlying offense or to the offender himself or herself.”
'As a general rule, we will affirm a restriction or condition imposed pursuant to [ ] statutory authority so long as the restriction or condition has some correlation or connection i.e., nexus to the underlying offense or to the offender himself or herself.'
'As a general rule, we will affirm a restriction or condition imposed pursuant to [ ] statutory authority so long as the restriction or condition has some correlation or connection i.e., nexus to the underlying offense or to the offender himself or herself.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James C. Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.