State v. Melton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying the following three factors to consider: (1) whether the court gave both parties the opportunity to explain their positions,(2) whether the court considered the defendant's interest in having the trial concluded in a single proceeding, and (3
• identifying the following three factors to consider: (1) whether the court gave both parties the opportunity to explain their positions, (2) whether the court considered the defendant's interest in having the trial concluded in a single proceeding, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-08-27· cited 22×
• State v. Sheets
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-06-21· cited 13×
• People v. Ware
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-07-31
• People v. Ware
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-08-12

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
• United States v. Jorn
  Supreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
• Wade v. Hunter
  Supreme Court· 1949-04-25· cited 1,511×
• Brady v. Samaha
  First Circuit· 1981-12-18· cited 47×
• United States v. Edward Starling
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-04-21· cited 43×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-28· cited 30×
• State v. Eldridge
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-04-04· cited 29×
• United States v. Lynch
  D.C. Circuit· 1978-12-29· cited 29×
• State v. Slemmer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-02· cited 25×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-11-20· cited 25×
• State v. Graham
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-07-17· cited 15×
• State v. Browning
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-10-15· cited 10×
• Vega v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-04-02· cited 7×