Skip to main content

State v. Melendez

Citations

  • 74 Conn. App. 215
  • 811 A.2d 261
  • 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim that consciousness of guilt instruction, as given, was inappropriate not renewable when counsel objected only generally to charge and not to actual instruction after it was given
  • when defendant objected generally to giving jury instruction on consciousness of guilt but did not object to wording of charge actually given, claim of instructional error was not preserved
  • “[i]t is axiomatic that a factfinder may infer an intent to kill from circumstantial evidence such as the type of weapon used, the manner in which it was used, the type of wound inflicted and the events leading to and immediately following the death” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • \[T]he defendant's fleeing the scene [of the murder] and subsequent flight to Puerto Rico are evidence of his consciousness of guilt. 'We have in the past considered consciousness of guilt evidence as part of the evidence from which a jury may draw an inference of an intent to kill.' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.