Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 8/27/2002
State v. Melanson
Citations
- 2002 ME 145
- 804 A.2d 394
- 2002 Me. 145
- 2002 Me. LEXIS 166
- 2002 WL 1980740
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The court’s determination of whether a juror can remain impartial is entitled to substantial deference because of the trial court’s ability to observe and assess the juror’s credibility.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander, Calkins, Clifford, Dana, Levy, Rudman, Saufley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LockhartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-08-15· cited 70×
- State of Maine v. Kenneth A. FaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2015-12-05· cited 22×
- State v. MerchantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-04-01· cited 8×
- State v. SutherlandOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-02· cited 7×
- State v. DurantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-11-05· cited 6×
- State v. MaloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-10-29
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. TurnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-03-03· cited 32×
- State v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-07-03· cited 18×
- State v. DePhilippoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-07-29· cited 17×
- State v. McCurdySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-04-18· cited 14×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-05-13· cited 14×
- State v. BoyceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-09-30· cited 11×
- State v. MairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1996-01-22· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.